Believing Lies
The funeral service for Doc and Kathleen took place on Monday, May 10, 1948. Less than a month later (and four years to the day after D-Day) on June 6, 1948, the organ chimes at the First Methodist Church were dedicated to Ross, the youngest brother in my father’s family. He had died on April 20, 1945, at the age of 23 on Okinawa. According to the local paper, Ross had been the only member of our church who’d given his life for his country during World War II. The dedication service must have been planned for a good long while. In fact, Kathleen had been in on the planning. It was she who had thought of honoring the memory of her youngest brother. And it was she who’d thought of the cathedral chimes for the church organ. Those chimes do seem to wing a heartfelt prayer heavenward. And it was Kathleen who’d made the donation with which the chimes were purchased.
It is difficult to imagine the vast depth and breadth of the communal heartache at that Sunday morning service. I wonder now whether they ever considered changing the date, holding it a few months later, when the most recent sorrow wouldn’t have been so fresh. But they didn’t. The set of chimes was installed; the plans were made; life goes on. Still grieving, family and friends sat down in church together for this express validation that made the losses more tangible. Dedicated to the memory of. It was something Kathleen had wanted. No one there that day would ever forget Ross, and they would not forget Kathleen either.
But some of her friends did seem to forget real Kathleen. Oh, they talked about her. For years they kept right on whispering about the night she died and repeating the gossip, nasty as it was, they felt driven to repeat. And as time distanced them from Kathleen, they began to abandon the person she really was. At some time after her death, one by one, they began to believe in a Kathleen who was not at all the one they knew when she was living. They didn’t do this consciously or maliciously. It was done to them. With insidious, persistent, whispered propaganda, they were turned away from her. Because the murderer didn’t stop at taking Kathleen’s life. He made it his business to kill her good name too.
It is said that Adolf Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, invented The Big Lie. Its principle is that the more outrageous the lie and the more often it is repeated, the more firmly people will believe it and the more widely it will spread. Goebbels gets entirely too much credit. American politicians have successfully indulged in that practice for years. I suppose it is taught in law schools or passed through generations in darkened rooms at Skull-and-Bone-ish secret meetings. Newspapers have used it for centuries. Look at what it did to Alexander Hamilton. And even crueler, what happened to Aaron Burr?
And it must be said southern politicians have used The Big Lie more facilely than those from any other region. We southerners do tell tales well. George Wallace may have been the most astute political genius of all time. He lied to everybody, black and white. And almost everybody believed him. When we say “politicking,” it is understood in the south that truth may take no role whatsoever in the proceedings. In the late 1800s politicians began to re-cast the history of Reconstruction in the south, so that it was mis-represented in history books and school books and even in the memories of people who’d been there and who should’ve known better. Generations grew up believing the lies they’d been taught.
Is that the real mystery? How is it that a people, any group of people large or small, want to believe the worst of others, even of someone they’ve admired or loved? Sadly, it is a reality of human nature that, whatever wicked distortion of the truth an ordinary mortal hears over and over again, eventually he or she will be inclined to believe that it must be true. Any lie, any calumny, any slander, however extreme or incredible, if repeated often enough by trusted friends, will become firmly entrenched in the fertile imaginations of those who listen. It’s a lie as persistent as southern purslane weed, almost impossible to root out and kill. The more effort there is to eradicate it, the healthier it grows until it takes over, even though facts and evidence may prove, over and over again, that the real truth is quite contrary to the lie.
I didn’t do them murders. And so began Byrd Richardson’s lies about the murders. And they were numerous. But there were so many people who knew the truth, who knew about his falsehoods. Though they were his cohorts in crime or they were witnesses or officials who had been threatened or paid off, Byrd took further precautions. Just in case anybody had reason to disbelieve his original lies, Byrd told more. Soon after the murders, even before he’d served as a pallbearer at Doc and Kathleen’s funeral, he and a coterie of his close associates began to tell other black and evil lies. The didn’t fib or quibble. They didn’t prevaricate. They lied outright.
Being so experienced in dirty politics, it came naturally to them. They’d headed off disasters in public relations before. It requires even less effort to assault the reputation of the dead than it does the living. (And even that isn’t too difficult.) The idea was to distract the townspeople from their grief and shock at the murders of Doc and Kathleen and their horror at way they were murdered and their bodies destroyed. They would accomplish this by making Kathleen somehow at fault for what had happened.
The plan was simple: malign Kathleen’s character. The lies didn’t have to be particularly believable. If they heard it often enough, people would believe anything. And these weren’t insipid, whining lies either. Those weak whimpering lies are so easily denied and found out. Oh no. For this plan to work, they would have to spread outrageous lies. The lies they told were bold and extreme and filthy. They were such shocking lies that they left the listeners speechless when they heard them told. But they were not speechless for long. These were the type of lies that must be shared.
Historically, it seems, it’s always the woman who is most susceptible to blame. Could be that’s Eve’s fault. No lie told about Doc would have been horrid enough to make the act of murder seem somehow less evil than it really was or make the murderer somehow less to blame. And possibly Kathleen had made it easier for people to believe those lies Byrd and his friends told, by being a free spirit, unencumbered by some of the conventional rules of conventional small town living.
She’d never cared much what people thought or said about her, and maybe she should have, just a little. It’s a fact that in her youth, she had been married and divorced twice, showing she had been perhaps impulsive in her affections. Both those earlier marriages had ended quite quickly, after just weeks or months. She and Doc had been impulsive too, when they married. But they had been married for almost a decade when they died. She’d settled into a life she loved with a man she loved. And Doc loved her. There was no doubt at all about that.
So, shocking lies were purpose-built and told, and many of Kathleen’s former friends were seduced into believing them. Some believed that she’d been engaged in a love affair with Byrd Richardson. Some were even willing to believe that she’d tempted him and, defenseless, he’d succumbed to her charms, that she was a siren who caused “his downfall.”
Some believed that on the night she died, with a crowd of her friends present, with Byrd Richardson watching, Kathleen had stripped off all her clothes and put on a long mink coat, swept her breakfast table clear of poker chips and cards, and then danced upon it for all there to see. As all these lies came to be believed, they were enough somehow to make Kathleen’s and Doc’s deaths less horrific and their killer less heinous. Well, she ought not to have done that nekkid dancin’ on the table. Then, it prob’ly wouldn’t never have happened.
Maybe the belief in those lies made the town feel a little less culpable in their own minds. As time went on, and the murderer lived among them and did just as he pleased, some may have used their faith in those falsehoods to assuage whatever guilt they might otherwise have felt. They were as good as certain who the killer was and did nothing about it. And they lived in fear.
Even the people who absolutely knew he did it and knew he lied about it, the ones who conspired with him to cover up the crime and lied about it for him, somehow down through the decades, they convinced themselves there had been no murders and that there was never any such house fire. One of them would have been a key witness, would have been the only one who could have sent him to prison. That person, who backed up his alibi and told police they were engaged in a telephone conversation at the time when the murders occurred, told me many years later exactly that. There was no fire. There were never any murders at all. As if Kathleen and Doc had never even existed at all.
But let’s look at those falsehoods logically and compare them to the facts we know. First, the love affair: There’s no doubt that this man had made many passes at many women. We’ve had some of those women recount for us the unwelcome advances he made towards them. We don’t know how many women were able to deflect his pawing and groping, how many were afraid to say no, how many were forced against their will. He wanted what he wanted when he wanted it. That’s the hallmark of a spoiled child grown into a criminal.
Kathleen was, when she died, a Republican candidate in a run-off election for a seat on the county school board. That alone seems to suggest at least that she wanted to donate her time to serve the school children of her county, a worthy pursuit of a thankless task, especially for a woman unable to have children of her own. For a Republican in Alabama in the 1940s, the race itself was probably as thankless as the office she sought. But the facts certainly prove that a substantial number of people in her county found her stable and trustworthy enough to give her their vote.
According to the people who knew him and were willing to talk about him, Byrd Richardson evoked utter disgust. He was an huge man of enormous appetites. He was often too drunk to get out of the car he drove home (on those nights when he’d made it to his own driveway), and he had to be helped into his house. The wife who helped him get inside, he often beat until she screamed for help. Screamed bloody murder, if you like. We don’t know how often he abused her physically or verbally or emotionally, when she did not scream. He shot guns into the air in town, near the houses of other people, where children lived, as a show of his power and uncontained freedom to do as he pleased. He was often so drunk that he relieved himself in his own front yard. He had the chronic bronchial cough of a sick drunk and heavy smoker, and what he coughed up he spat on his own floors or anyone else’s, expecting others to clean up after him. It might be said that the only attractive things about Byrd Richardson were his extreme wealth and lack of heirs.
Kathleen was happy in her marriage, and she had made her feelings about Byrd clear to those who were close to her. She simply could not stand the sight of him. She found him revolting. She was certainly not interested in his money. If he made a drunken pass at her the night she died, and I believe he did, she rejected him absolutely and without pity or apology. A new experience for him perhaps.
Now about the nude dancing: People said that Byrd said that Kathleen danced naked the night she died. Well, it makes a fascinating story. It makes a very titillating adolescent male fantasy, But it’s not such a convincing lie, when held up to the light. The behavior described in that fantasy would be the act of a woman who is desperate for male attention and tragically unsure of her ability to attract it. That woman would have a character and personality diametrically opposite to that of my Aunt Kathleen. She was neither desperate nor unsure. She was more confident than most. She never lacked for the attention and admiration of men. She often got more than she wanted. And, it’s difficult to imagine even a sad and desperate woman doing such a degrading thing while sober and in her right mind.
So let us consider whether Kathleen was under the influence of alcohol the night she died. I’d like to be able to report the amount of alcohol found in her body by the state toxicologist. But, unfortunately, according to his report, her body was so utterly consumed by the fire that only a portion of the stomach, intestines, heart and lungs remained. All her extremities were destroyed. Even her chest and pelvic bones were totally gone. There was no blood left to test.
Let us suppose for the sake of argument that she had been intoxicated and, further, that she had taken a notion to provide such a humiliating performance. Wouldn’t Doc have prevented her, if he were able? Fortunately, Doc’s upper body did have enough blood and tissue left for such tests. (Although, interestingly, his lower limbs, abdomen, and pelvis were also destroyed by the fire. Perhaps special attention was paid to those areas by the person who poured the gasoline over the bodies.) Those tests show that he had indeed been drinking. He had alcohol in his bloodstream when he died. But, according to a letter from a state forensics official, the alcohol found in Doc’s blood was about half the amount accepted by the National Safety Council in 1948 as the maximum legal allowance for a person driving a car. Doc was at the very least legally sober enough to operate an automobile when he was killed.
Some may suggest that Doc could have been drunker earlier in the evening, when the dance could have occurred. But witnesses said that he and Kathleen were out to dinner until 10:00 o’clock. Then friends came over for cards. None of those friends, when questioned by police, reported any such dancing. And they said Doc didn’t drink to excess. Byrd Richardson didn’t leave the river camp till midnight and couldn’t have arrived at the card party before 12:30. The other guests, who all reported that Byrd was there, left sometime after he arrived. The murders must have taken place early in the wee hours of the morning. The fire was discovered between 3:00 and 4:00 a.m. There had to be time after the murders to go for the gasoline, bring it back and set the fire. So whatever alcohol Doc had in his blood at the time he was murdered was probably the most he’d had that night.
Doc was not drunk. And he would not have allowed such a dance, if by some uncharacteristic lapse in judgment or even consciousness, Kathleen had been inclined to perform it. If Byrd Richardson had insulted his wife, Doc was sober enough (and certainly would have been angry enough) to order him to leave his house. Another new and unpleasant experience for Byrd.
According to a letter written by one of the state investigators, witnesses who spent the evening playing cards with the murdered couple and who were present at the scene before the murders occurred “said that [Kathleen] had been drinking much less than [Doc] on that evening.” In fact, she drank very little, if at all. So Doc had consumed little enough alcohol that he could have driven a car legally, and Kathleen had consumed even less than he did.
Now consider this thirty-six-year-old woman. She’d had very little, if anything, to drink. She was about to face a runoff election for the school board. She was planning to attend within the month a service at the Methodist Church, a service very important to her, honoring her dead brother and dedicating the new organ chimes to him. Would she have stood on a table and performed a provocative dance, in the nude, except for a full length fur coat, in the presence of her friends? Would she have done it under any circumstances? No. Certainly not. Absolutely not. It would’ve been irrational, unwise, ill-advised, out of character. Whatever else she may have been, Kathleen was not dull-witted. She would never have done any such thing. Of course, there is the fact that Kathleen never owned a full-length fur coat, but that’s a minor detail in the face of the other facts. And then, there is Byrd’s alibi, which put him at home in bed, talking on the telephone, when the table dance was supposed to have occurred and when the murders did occur. So many lies, they begin to conflict with one another.
Early and often he lied. It’s a secret that belongs to powerful politicians. Just as he routinely bought influence and bought elections by paying people to vote, early and often and on behalf of the citizens of several cemeteries, Byrd Richardson and his associates fabricated those accusations against Kathleen. The lies they made up were absurd lies, almost laughable except for the circumstances. And together, they spread them around to win him some form of favor or sympathy amongst the townspeople.
After his foolhardy protestations in the bank on Saturday morning, Byrd and his family could see, no doubt, that he would look guilty. And they knew he was guilty. There were witnesses whom they had been unable to bribe, but could only threaten. They couldn’t completely count on fear to keep them quiet. The family would try to prevent an indictment (and eventually succeed) with their local and state-wide influence. But they couldn’t be fully certain immediately after the murders that their influence would be enough. They needed potential jurors to have some sympathy for Byrd, well-entrenched and well ahead of any potential trial.
I wonder now what hymns were played that Sunday, June 6th, 1948, on the organ, with chiming flourishes, of course. “What a Friend We Have in Jesus” keeps ringing through my early church memories. And “America the Beautiful.” And what Bible verses may have been read? I wish they had read from the Old Testament prophet, Isaiah, first chapter, if only just verse 3. It’s just possible someone among them would have heard and remembered in days to come the prophet’s description of the Messiah. “He will not judge by appearances nor make decisions based on hearsay.” That’s a perfection for which all human beings should strive, though we all would certainly fail again and again.
More likely verses come to mind, including some from the 91st Psalm:
“Under his wings shalt thou trust: his truth shall be thy shield and buckler. Thou shalt not be afraid for the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday. A thousand shall fall at thy side, and ten thousand at thy right hand; but it shall not come nigh thee. . . .”
Safe at last, all three of them, Ross, Kathleen and Doc.
Though almost all the people of our town have believed for sixty years that Byrd was guilty of the murders, some were also persuaded to believe that Kathleen, his innocent victim, somehow shared in his guilt. Like all dirty politics, it worked. I suppose it’s still working. There are people who still believe it. Bless their hearts. After three generations, that old devil Byrd still reaches out from the grave, or the depths of Hell, to keep the truth hidden.
It was a good day for Satan, when Byrd landed on his brimstone doorstep. He’d found himself an apt apprentice.
The Right Southern Corner is a series by Sara Rast
Copyright: 2009 Sara Love Rast. All rights reserved.